Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: in patient with major hypertrophy and ptosis a free nipple dermo
glandular flap is procedure of choice a major limitation of this technique is in sufficient
breast projection, using of lateral based dermo-glandular flap can added additional tissue
to increase projection and good filling.
Methods: Marking based on principle of breast; when excised tissue made, marked for
diamond dermo- glandular flap from breast tissue before to excise then de- epithelized
and fix on pectoral fascia.
Results: 8 cases done by this technique; the depending criteria include major breast
hypertrophy and ptosis more than 1500 g, Nipple -areolar transposition >15 cm; no major
complication just superficial Slugging of nipple areolar graft, that heal spontaneously
with good improvement in symptoms and good breast projection and Shape
Conclusions: using lateral based dermo-glandular flap give good shape and breast
projection and effective in major breast hypertrophy and Ptosis.

Keywords

Hypertrophy ptosis reduction mammoplasty free nipple graft

Article Details

References

  1. - Stevens W. Gear A, Stoker D et al. (2008): Outpatient reduction mammoplasty:
  2. an eleven-year experience. Aesth Surg J: 28(2):171-179.
  3. - Serra MP, Longhi P and Sinha M (2010): Breast reduction with a superomedial
  4. pedicle and a vertical scar (Hall-Findlay's technique): Experience with 210 consecutive
  5. patients. Ann Plast Surg; 64:275-278
  6. - Karsidag S, Akcal A, Karsidag T, et al. Reduction mammaplasty using the free
  7. nipp vertical technique for severe breast hypertrophy: improved outcomes with the
  8. dermaglandular flap. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35(2):254.-61
  9. - Ozeruem OR, Anlatici R, Maral T, et al. Modified free nipple graft reduction
  10. mammaplasty to increase breast projection with superior and inferior dermoglandular
  11. flaps. Ann Plast 2002;49(5):10-506.
  12. - Eggert E, Schuss R, Edsander-Nord A. Clinical outcome, quality of life patients'
  13. satisfaction, and aesthetic results, after reduction mammoplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr
  14. Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(4):201- 6
  15. - Alexandre A, Leão F, Álvaro F et al. (2011): Comparative analysis of
  16. mammaplasty techniques based on the long-term effect on MANUSCRIPT CENTRAL
  17. b the nipple-areolar-complex to inframammary crease distance. Rev. Bras. Cir.
  18. Plást. 2011; 26(4): 664-9
  19. - Marshall WR, Notma KR, Camille K. TheUS health system origin and functions
  20. (M). (5th ed). New York, USA: Delmar Thomson Learning. 2002;180.
  21. - Spear SL. Breast reduction: inverted-T technique. In: Thorne C, Grabb WC,
  22. Smith JW (eds) Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott
  23. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA. 2007.
  24. - Fernandez S, Coady L, Cohen-Shohet R, et al. Comparative outcomes and quality
  25. analysis of inverted-T and pure vertical scar techniques in superomedial pedicle reduction
  26. mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76Suppl 4: S328.-31
  27. - Zhang MX, Chen CY, Fang QQ, et al. Risk factors for complications after
  28. reduction mammoplasty: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(12): e0167746
  29. - Zhao R. Qiao Q. Analysis of the complications of two kinds reduction
  30. mammaplasty, Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;23(5):375-77

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)